All Library branches will be closed and the Mobile Library will not make its regularly scheduled stops on Monday, May 29, for Memorial Day.

The Library Center and Schweitzer Brentwood branch libraries will not have phone service Monday, May 29-Tuesday, May 30, due to maintenance. Please call (417) 865-1340 for assistance.

array
1
struct
ICON_URL /images/research/topics/law.gif
LABEL_ID 54
LABEL_NAME Law
LABEL_URL law.cfm

Related Resources

struct
ARTICLE
array
1
struct
ARTICLE_DATE March, 01 2011 13:29:00
ARTICLE_DATE_STR 20110301
ARTICLE_DESCRIPTION First Jewish female member of the United States Supreme Court.
ARTICLE_ID 1302
ARTICLE_STATUS published
ARTICLE_TEXT <p>President Bill Clinton chose Ruth Bader Ginsburg as his first appointment to the United States Supreme Court. He nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on June 14, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring Justice Byron White.&nbsp;</p> <p>During her confirmation hearings, she refused to answer questions regarding her personal views on most issues. Despite this, the U.S. Senate confirmed her by a 96-to-3 vote. She took her judicial oath on August 10, 1993.</p> <p><i>Notable cases</i>:</p> <p>United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) Court Opinion. Virginia Military Institute's male-only admission policy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated that because VMI failed to show &quot;exceedingly persuasive justification&quot; for its sex-biased admissions policy, it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.</p> <p>Olmstead v. LC., 527 U.S. 581 (1999) Court Opinion. This case regarded discrimination of people with disabilities in institutions. The Supreme Court held that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with disabilities have the right to live in the community rather than in institutions if (1) their treatment professionals determine that they are able to live in the community; (2) the individuals do not object to live in the community; and (3) provision of services in the community can be provided without fundamentally altering the way in which the state serves people similar people with disabilities.</p> <p><br /> Know more:<br /> <a href="http://coolcat.org/record=b2541968~S1">The Supreme Court : a C-SPAN book featuring the justices in their own words</a></p> <p><a href="http://coolcat.org/record=b2341840~S1">Stars of David : prominent Jews talk about being Jewish</a></p> <p><a href="http://coolcat.org/record=b2434600~S1">Video resources on the Constitution - Judicial independence: a Conversation on the Constitution with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Fourteenth Amendment</a></p>
ARTICLE_TITLE Ruth Bader Ginsburg
ARTICLE_TYPE_ID 1
ARTICLE_TYPE_NAME Article
ARTICLE_YEAR_MONTH_STR 201103
NEW_USERID 10
PAGENAME article.cfm
USERFNAME Tysha
USERID 11
USERNAME undefined
USER_FNAME Tysha
USER_LOGIN tyshas
COMMENTS
array [empty]
LABELS
array
1
struct
ARTICLE_ID 1302
GROUPDIR research
GROUP_ID 83
GROUP_NAME Research
ICON_URL /images/research/topics/law.gif
LABEL_ID 54
LABEL_NAME Law
LABEL_URL law.cfm
LINKS
array [empty]
Law

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

President Bill Clinton chose Ruth Bader Ginsburg as his first appointment to the United States Supreme Court. He nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on June 14, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring Justice Byron White. 

During her confirmation hearings, she refused to answer questions regarding her personal views on most issues. Despite this, the U.S. Senate confirmed her by a 96-to-3 vote. She took her judicial oath on August 10, 1993.

Notable cases:

United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) Court Opinion. Virginia Military Institute's male-only admission policy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated that because VMI failed to show "exceedingly persuasive justification" for its sex-biased admissions policy, it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.

Olmstead v. LC., 527 U.S. 581 (1999) Court Opinion. This case regarded discrimination of people with disabilities in institutions. The Supreme Court held that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with disabilities have the right to live in the community rather than in institutions if (1) their treatment professionals determine that they are able to live in the community; (2) the individuals do not object to live in the community; and (3) provision of services in the community can be provided without fundamentally altering the way in which the state serves people similar people with disabilities.


Know more:
The Supreme Court : a C-SPAN book featuring the justices in their own words

Stars of David : prominent Jews talk about being Jewish

Video resources on the Constitution - Judicial independence: a Conversation on the Constitution with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Fourteenth Amendment


Find this article at

Free wi-fi

Friends of the library

The Library Foundation

Bookmark and Share

Sign up for the newsletter

© Springfield-Greene County Library District