All Library branches will be closed and the Mobile Library will not make its regularly scheduled stops on Monday, May 29, for Memorial Day.

The Library Center and Schweitzer Brentwood branch libraries will not have phone service Monday, May 29-Tuesday, May 30, due to maintenance. Please call (417) 865-1340 for assistance.

array
1
struct
ICON_URL /images/research/topics/education.gif
LABEL_ID 68
LABEL_NAME Education
LABEL_URL education.cfm

Related Resources

struct
ARTICLE
array
1
struct
ARTICLE_DATE May, 30 2012 15:56:00
ARTICLE_DATE_STR 20120530
ARTICLE_DESCRIPTION As of May 11, the Next Generation Science Standards are available for viewing and comments. These could be adopted for use in classrooms as early as this fall.
ARTICLE_ID 1905
ARTICLE_STATUS published
ARTICLE_TEXT <p>The creation and adoption of the <a href="http://www.corestandards.org/">Common Core State Standards</a> have given rise to science organizations and educators to create &ldquo;national&rdquo; standards in science. The National Research Council, the National Science Teachers Association, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science came together in early 2010 to begin the development of such <a href="http://www.nextgenscience.org/">standards</a>. They agreed on three dimensions of learning that would be the common thread among the standards- content, concepts, and practices. Eighteen individuals- practicing scientists, nobel laureates, cognitive scientists, science education researchers, and policy experts were selected to head the committees for standards development.</p> <p>In July of 2010, the Frameworks&nbsp;were released for general review and comment. Since that time, further work continued in order to more clearly define and establish standards. Representatives from many states took part in this process.</p> <p>On May 11, the final <a href="http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards ">draft </a>of the standards was released to the public for review until June 1. During this time, stakeholders will assign groups to conduct careful analysis of these standards and begin the decision-making process of how or when to adopt these standards. Among these stakeholders include: Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Missouri State Teachers Association, and National Education Association. Each of these groups have certain political and educational influence on the education of children. <br /> You will begin to hear and read reviews and criticism about the standards as the June 1 deadline draws closer. Achieve, another association of states working with the Common Core State Standards, has published a <a href="http://www.achieve.org/naep-science-results-demonstrate-importance-developing-next-generation-science-standards">review</a>&nbsp;of NAEP performance and the need for&nbsp;science standards. You can check the <a href="http://dese.mo.gov/college-career-readiness/curriculum/science">DESE </a>site for updates regarding their review work over the summer, and whether the state will adopt them without changes, or create standards from these examples.</p> <p>The major difference between the Next Generation Science initiative and the Common Core State Standards is funding. CCSS received both private and government funds for the development of standards, and Achieve and SMARTER Balanced received stimulus money from the federal government to develop a common assessment. There are still many questions as to the next step in the process for science; at this time there are no funds being made available directly from the federal government. As more conversations occur regarding these standards, there could be a national conversation in regards to publicly funding the development of assessments for these standards.</p> <p>Books in our library:<br /> <a href="http://coolcat.org/record=b2455831~S1">Jump into science : active learning for preschool children</a> by Rae Pica&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="http://coolcat.org/record=b2068190~S1">Teaching physics with TOYS : activities for grades K-9</a> by Beverley A.P. Taylor&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="http://coolcat.org/record=b2623735~S1">Science fair season : twelve kids, a robot named Scorch-- and what it takes to win</a> by Judy Dutton&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="http://coolcat.org/record=b2700875~S1">Help Your Kids with Science&nbsp;</a></p>
ARTICLE_TITLE What's "next" for science standards in school?
ARTICLE_TYPE_ID 1
ARTICLE_TYPE_NAME Article
ARTICLE_YEAR_MONTH_STR 201205
NEW_USERID 44
PAGENAME article.cfm
USERFNAME Michele
USERID 48
USERNAME undefined
USER_FNAME Michele
USER_LOGIN micheler
COMMENTS
array [empty]
LABELS
array
1
struct
ARTICLE_ID 1905
GROUPDIR research
GROUP_ID 83
GROUP_NAME Research
ICON_URL /images/research/topics/education.gif
LABEL_ID 68
LABEL_NAME Education
LABEL_URL education.cfm
LINKS
array [empty]
Education

What's "next" for science standards in school?

The creation and adoption of the Common Core State Standards have given rise to science organizations and educators to create “national” standards in science. The National Research Council, the National Science Teachers Association, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science came together in early 2010 to begin the development of such standards. They agreed on three dimensions of learning that would be the common thread among the standards- content, concepts, and practices. Eighteen individuals- practicing scientists, nobel laureates, cognitive scientists, science education researchers, and policy experts were selected to head the committees for standards development.

In July of 2010, the Frameworks were released for general review and comment. Since that time, further work continued in order to more clearly define and establish standards. Representatives from many states took part in this process.

On May 11, the final draft of the standards was released to the public for review until June 1. During this time, stakeholders will assign groups to conduct careful analysis of these standards and begin the decision-making process of how or when to adopt these standards. Among these stakeholders include: Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Missouri State Teachers Association, and National Education Association. Each of these groups have certain political and educational influence on the education of children.
You will begin to hear and read reviews and criticism about the standards as the June 1 deadline draws closer. Achieve, another association of states working with the Common Core State Standards, has published a review of NAEP performance and the need for science standards. You can check the DESE site for updates regarding their review work over the summer, and whether the state will adopt them without changes, or create standards from these examples.

The major difference between the Next Generation Science initiative and the Common Core State Standards is funding. CCSS received both private and government funds for the development of standards, and Achieve and SMARTER Balanced received stimulus money from the federal government to develop a common assessment. There are still many questions as to the next step in the process for science; at this time there are no funds being made available directly from the federal government. As more conversations occur regarding these standards, there could be a national conversation in regards to publicly funding the development of assessments for these standards.

Books in our library:
Jump into science : active learning for preschool children by Rae Pica 

Teaching physics with TOYS : activities for grades K-9 by Beverley A.P. Taylor 

Science fair season : twelve kids, a robot named Scorch-- and what it takes to win by Judy Dutton 

Help Your Kids with Science 


Find this article at

Free wi-fi

Friends of the library

The Library Foundation

Bookmark and Share

Sign up for the newsletter

© Springfield-Greene County Library District